Crypto regulations in the US: Navigating a complex landscape

About 65 million Americans now own cryptocurrency, but the rules governing it remain a tangled web of state laws, federal agency guidelines and developing court rulings. With the US moving toward clearer policies, crypto investors and innovators are left navigating a fragmented regulatory space. This article discusses current US crypto regulations, explores major regulatory challenges and the country’s stance on crypto, and examines the relevance of current US rules to traders and the larger industry.

Key Takeaways:

• The US is shifting toward lighter, innovation-friendly crypto regulation, with moves like the FIT21 Act, a repeal of SAB 121 and a more lenient SEC approach.

• Fragmented oversight and evolving rules — especially around stablecoins, asset classification and AML — still pose challenges for consistent compliance.

• Strategic steps, such as launching a Bitcoin reserve and encouraging institutional adoption, suggest long-term government interest in integrating crypto into the US financial system.

What are crypto regulations?

Crypto regulations are legal frameworks set by governments to manage the creation, trading, taxation and use of digital assets. These regulations aim to protect consumers, prevent illegal activities and maintain market integrity.

The current US stance on crypto

The US regulatory stance on cryptocurrency in 2025 is moving toward greater clarity and support for innovation, though a unified federal framework is still in the works. The Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), passed by the House of Representatives in 2024, aims to establish comprehensive rules for digital assets but has yet to be fully implemented. Signaling a more crypto-friendly direction, the Trump administration issued an executive order in January 2025 to create the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, with the goal of “providing regulatory clarity and certainty.” Chaired by David Sacks, the group is tasked with reviewing current laws and recommending reforms to encourage responsible innovation.

Federal agencies are gradually shifting their approach. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), traditionally strict with crypto enforcement, has formed a dedicated crypto task force. This group is working to simplify registration processes, outline disclosure expectations and provide clarity as to which tokens qualify as securities. Notably, the SEC has softened its stance on certain categories of cryptocurrencies, such as meme coins, indicating they may no longer be treated as securities.

Banking regulators have also relaxed their oversight. The Federal Reserve rescinded prior guidance requiring banks to notify regulators before engaging in crypto-related activities, opting instead for standard supervisory oversight. Likewise, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has confirmed that banks can participate in permissible crypto activities without prior approval as long as they manage risks appropriately.

State-level regulations, however, remain highly fragmented. Wyoming continues to lead with crypto-friendly policies, offering clear licensing and legal protections that attract blockchain businesses. In contrast, some states still maintain stricter or underdeveloped frameworks, resulting in a regulatory patchwork that complicates compliance for companies operating across state lines.

In other developments, the federal government has launched the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Stockpile, an unprecedented move that integrates digital assets into national infrastructure planning. While this initiative signals strong institutional interest, it also introduces new compliance challenges for both government agencies and market participants.

What regulatory issues exist for cryptocurrency?

Cryptocurrency regulation in the US in 2025 continues to grapple with several persistent challenges, despite efforts to establish clearer frameworks. 

• Regulatory clarity and fragmentation: The absence of a unified federal regulatory framework in the US leads to inconsistencies across states, creating a complex environment for compliance. While some states have adopted crypto-friendly policies, others have imposed stricter regulations, resulting in a patchwork that complicates nationwide operations for crypto firms.

• Classification of digital assets: Determining whether cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities, commodities or a new asset class remains a contentious issue. This ambiguity affects the way that digital assets are regulated, and what compliance measures are required.

• Stablecoin oversight: Stablecoins, which are pegged to traditional currencies, pose unique regulatory challenges. Issues such as reserve transparency, redemption rights and systemic risk are central to ongoing debates about how to effectively regulate these digital assets.

• Technological evolution: The rapid advancement of blockchain technology often outpaces regulatory developments, making it difficult for regulators to address emerging risks and for businesses to ensure compliance with outdated or unclear regulations.

• Global coordination: Cryptocurrencies operate on a global scale, but regulatory approaches vary widely between countries. This lack of international coordination can lead to regulatory arbitrage, whereby companies exploit more lenient jurisdictions, undermining global financial stability.

Why this matters for crypto traders and the industry

As crypto matures from the fringes of finance into the mainstream, clear rules and oversight are needed to protect individuals and to nurture a stable, trustworthy ecosystem that benefits everyone involved.

• Investor protection: The crypto market’s rapid rise has been matched by equally dramatic crashes, often fueled by fraud, misinformation or inadequate oversight. For instance, the collapses of FTX and Terra Luna in 2022 were wake-up calls that exposed retail investors’ vulnerability within unregulated environments. Without regulatory safeguards, investors face scams, market manipulation and a lack of legal recourse when platforms fail. Insights from the MIT Sloan School of Management show that less experienced traders tend to suffer the most in these situations. Regulation helps level the playing field by enforcing transparency, requiring disclosures and ensuring fair market conduct.

• Fighting financial crime: The decentralized nature of crypto attracts bad actors, but effective regulation doesn’t have to choke innovation. By implementing AML standards, identity verification and travel rules for transactions, regulators can weed out illicit use while preserving the freedom that makes crypto valuable. The FATF has shown that compliance frameworks can actually strengthen the ecosystem by making it safer and more reputable, encouraging broader adoption.

• Institutional adoption: Banks, pension funds, corporations and other institutional players remain cautious about entering the crypto space, largely due to unclear or inconsistent rules. For crypto to mature, it needs the backing of these heavyweight participants. Regulation provides the clarity and guardrails needed for institutions to confidently integrate digital assets into their offerings. It also gives companies a framework with which to responsibly manage crypto on their balance sheets. As noted by the IMF, sound regulation is essential for promoting financial stability and integrating crypto into the global economy responsibly.

• Creating stability: Wild price swings have become synonymous with crypto, deterring everyday users and investors. While some volatility is inherent in emerging markets, regulation can help tame the most extreme fluctuations. Rules that curb manipulation, standardize asset valuation and introduce safeguards such as circuit breakers during crashes can bring much-needed stability. The IMF notes that aligning crypto with existing capital flow policies can minimize market disruptions, making this asset class more resilient and able to appeal to a broader audience.

• Legal clarity and taxation: One of the biggest headaches in crypto is the lack of legal consistency. Is it a security? A commodity? Property? Depending upon the agency or jurisdiction, the answer changes. This patchwork creates confusion for businesses and individual traders alike, especially when it comes to tax obligations and compliance requirements. Clear regulations would define the legal status of digital assets, harmonize tax treatment and reduce the operational burden of navigating conflicting rules.

• Preventing systemic risks: Crypto is no longer isolated from the traditional financial system. The crash of Terra/Luna rippled across hedge funds, banks and investments worldwide. As digital assets grow in scale and interconnect with global finance, the risk of contagion increases. Regulation can serve as a buffer, enforcing capital requirements, setting risk management standards and ensuring failing firms can be wound down without causing widespread damage. The Financial Stability Board has laid out critical recommendations in this area to guard against systemic failures.

• Global coordination and interoperability: Because crypto is borderless, inconsistent regulations between countries create loopholes and compliance nightmares. Without global coordination, companies can exploit lenient jurisdictions or find themselves locked out of key markets. A harmonized international approach, such as the EU’s MiCA framework or IOSCO’s global standards, would make cross-border activity smoother, reduce regulatory arbitrage and allow the industry to scale more cohesively and responsibly.

The future of US crypto regulation

The US is transitioning toward a pro-innovation crypto regime, with emphasis on deregulation, legislative clarity and strategic asset management. Its nascent administration has signaled a significant departure from the previous enforcement-heavy approach, prioritizing regulatory clarity and industry growth. Key actions include the January 2025 executive order establishing an interagency task force to review and potentially rescind restrictive regulations, alongside the SEC’s dismissal of high-profile cases against Coinbase, Robinhood Crypto and OpenSea. 

Meanwhile, the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, led by Hester M. Peirce, aims to streamline registration paths for tokens and clarify jurisdictional boundaries, particularly for meme coins, which the SEC no longer classifies as securities. In addition, the repeal of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121 removes barriers for banks offering crypto custody services, thus encouraging institutional participation.

Bipartisan efforts are gaining momentum in the push to formalize crypto oversight, with stablecoin regulation leading the charge. Key proposals like the GENIUS Act and the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act of 2023 are pushing for requirements such as 1:1 reserves, regular audits and greater transparency from issuers, bringing stablecoins more in line with traditional financial standards. 

At the same time, the CFTC and SEC are working out jurisdictional boundaries, and Congress is expected to pass market structure legislation that will determine whether crypto assets are classified as securities or commodities. These moves are designed to reduce the regulatory landscape’s current fragmentation, as stablecoins now face a patchwork of state-level regulations that drive up compliance costs.

The bottom line

The US federal government is moving toward a clearer and more innovative crypto regulatory regime, making efforts to streamline oversight, push institutional adoption and integrate digital assets into economic strategy. However, until federal policies fully align and state differences are reconciled, the regulatory environment for crypto in the US remains complex and dynamic. Traders and industry players need to understand this complex but maturing environment in order to navigate risks and grab emerging opportunities.

#LearnWithBybit