Ethereum Staking ETFs: Mainstream entry into ETH rewards

Since their debut in July 2024, Ethereum Spot ETFs have drawn interest but have fallen short of the momentum seen with Bitcoin Spot ETFs. While Bitcoin Spot ETFs amassed over $52 billion in assets within eight months of their approval by the SEC six months earlier, Ethereum Spot ETFs gathered only around $7 billion in the same time frame. A likely key reason for this gap is the absence of staking rewards, an added incentive that could offer investors additional yield. However, this may soon change, as 21Shares and a few other asset managers have submitted proposals to incorporate staking features into their existing Ethereum Spot ETFs. This article explores proposed ETH Staking ETFs and their potential impact on the broader market.

Key Takeaways:

• Ethereum Staking ETFs enable investors to earn staking rewards through a regulated, easy-to-access investment product without needing to manage validator nodes or lock up their Ether (ETH).

• If approved, staking ETFs could boost demand for ETH, reduce circulating supply and attract significant institutional capital, potentially driving Ethereum’s price upward.

• SEC approval of staking ETFs would confirm that Ethereum staking isn’t a securities activity, thereby encouraging more crypto financial products while addressing concerns about centralization and liquidity.

What is an Ethereum Staking ETF?

An Ethereum Staking ETF is a regulated investment fund that holds Ether (ETH) and participates in Ethereum's proof of stake (PoS) consensus, allowing investors to earn staking rewards without directly managing validator nodes. 

These ETFs combine the accessibility of traditional exchange-traded funds with the yield-generating potential of Ethereum staking, offering passive income through network validation while maintaining liquidity for investors.

How will an Ethereum Staking ETF Work?

Unlike a conventional Ethereum ETF that solely tracks the price of ETH, a staking-enabled ETF actively puts its underlying holdings to work by participating in Ethereum’s PoS consensus mechanism. This allows investors to benefit from ETH’s price movements and to earn additional yield from staking rewards, effectively creating a dual-source return structure.

The ETF provider (such as 21Shares) collects capital from shareholders, and acquires and securely holds Ether (ETH) in a regulated custody solution. Each share of the ETF is fully backed by an equivalent amount of ETH to ensure transparent collateralization. Because staking with Ethereum requires a minimum of 32 ETH per validator, the ETF uses a pooled staking model. This approach allows fractional ETH contributions to enable participation in staking, with the fund either running its own validator infrastructure or partnering with professional staking service providers. Once staked, the ETH contributes to the security of the network and earns its contributors rewards that accumulate over time.

The handling of these staking rewards is a key differentiator: the ETF may either distribute the earned ETH as dividends, providing a direct yield to shareholders, or automatically reinvest the rewards to increase the fund’s net asset value (NAV). Reinvestment can compound returns and amplify long-term gains, offering a distinct advantage over non-staking ETFs. However, staking introduces liquidity constraints, as staked ETH is subject to lockup periods. To maintain daily liquidity for investors, the ETF may hold a portion of its ETH in reserve or use liquid staking derivatives — tokens that represent staked ETH, but can be traded more freely.

This structure comes with additional considerations. Management fees must cover not only the usual operational costs, but also those tied to staking, such as validator maintenance, custody security and technical infrastructure. There are also risks involved, including slashing penalties for validator errors or downtime, as well as potential losses from technical failures. To mitigate these risks, ETF providers often implement robust risk management frameworks, such as diversified validator strategies and/or insurance mechanisms.

The current landscape of the Ethereum Staking ETF

Industry players such as Bitwise, Grayscale Investments and 21Shares have proposed integrating staking capabilities into their Ethereum ETFs, a departure from simple price tracking to creating products that also provide passive income through Ethereum's staking rewards. However, as of Jun 12, 2025, the SEC has yet to grant final approvals. For example, on May 21, the SEC delayed its decision on Bitwise's application to add staking to its Ether ETF, requesting a deeper analysis of public comments and potential structural risks.

In order to sidestep regulatory obstacles, REX Shares has taken an unconventional route, filing for C corporation–structured Ethereum and Solana staking ETFs designed to bypass standard SEC timelines. These could launch as early as June 2025 under a unique regulatory mechanism. Despite the foot-dragging, industry experts remain optimistic about regulatory approval by late 2025. 

This optimism follows from a change in the SEC’s stance, which recently clarified that participating in Ethereum's PoS network would no longer be viewed as a securities transaction. The new guidance marks a move away from the SEC's previous enforcement-heavy approach, and could open the door for approval of staking ETFs. However, the SEC is moving with caution, citing the need to address various risks, such as validator slashing and liquidity challenges related to lockup periods.

The road ahead

Market sentiment is cautiously optimistic. Experts believe that integrating staking into ETFs could unlock significant growth for Ethereum, offering both yield benefits and growth potential. Marcin Kazmierczak, co-founder and COO of blockchain oracle firm RedStone, stated that while these developments are evolutionary, they lay the foundation for broader crypto acceptance and regulatory clarity. Brian Fabian Crain, CEO of Chorus One, echoed this sentiment, expressing cautious optimism that approval may come within a favorable regulatory time frame, possibly before the end of US President Trump’s final term. 

Outside the US, products like the Purpose Investments’ Ether Staking ETF (CAD: ETHR.B) and the 3iQ Ether Staking ETF (ETHQ) in Canada have demonstrated strong demand, validating the model. Until the SEC arrives at a final decision, US applicants remain in limbo. The way forward hinges on reconciling crypto’s mechanics with traditional frameworks.

What will it mean if an Ethereum Staking ETF application is approved?

The approval of an Ethereum Staking ETF would be a big deal for both cryptocurrency markets and traditional finance (TradFi), with cascading effects across institutional adoption, retail investment and blockchain economics.

• Price momentum for ETH: Approval could serve as a major price catalyst, boosting demand for ETH as the underlying asset. Historical trends show that ETF-related speculation has already fueled Ethereum’s 80% rally from its April 2025 lows. Staking ETFs could further tighten the supply-demand balance, since locking up more ETH via staking reduces circulating supply, potentially accelerating upward price momentum. Analysts suggest that if staking ETFs gain traction, Ethereum could retest its all-time high of $4,878. 

• Mainstream access to staking yields: Approval of a staking ETF would allow retail and institutional investors to earn Ethereum’s staking rewards without the technical complexities of running a validator node or locking up ETH. This could significantly broaden participation in Ethereum’s PoS ecosystem, as ETFs provide a regulated, liquid and familiar investment vehicle. Analysts predict such a product could unlock billions of dollars in institutional capital that’s currently sidelined, due to custody and operational hurdles. 

• Legitimizing staking: SEC approval would effectively confirm that staking doesn’t qualify as a securities offering, following the regulator’s May 2025 guidance that protocol-level staking falls outside securities rules. This could open the door for more crypto-native financial products, helping to reduce legal uncertainty for DeFi protocols, custody providers and asset managers. However, the SEC might still impose conditions, such as limits on staked ETH or strict custody requirements, in order to address potential risks like slashing or liquidity mismatches.

• Network effects: By encouraging more ETH staking, these ETFs could boost Ethereum’s security and decentralization because a larger validator set strengthens the network’s resilience. However, critics caution that heavy institutional staking could introduce centralization risks, particularly if a small number of large custodians control most of the validator nodes. On the retail side, staking ETFs might lower barriers to DeFi participation, allowing individual investors to gain exposure to Ethereum’s staking economy without the complexities of managing private keys.

• Competitive boost for crypto finance: Staking ETFs have the potential to transform the ETF space, making Ethereum products more competitive with Bitcoin ETFs that currently dominate the market. Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock’s head of digital assets, has pointed out that staking yields are crucial to the success of Ethereum ETFs, since their absence has led to underperformance as compared to Bitcoin ETFs. Again, TradFi players, such as banks and hedge funds, may increasingly incorporate staking ETFs into their yield-generating strategies, further blurring the lines between crypto and conventional finance.

The bottom line

Ethereum Staking ETF approvals could possibly be a significant milestone for crypto investment, merging yield-generating DeFi mechanics with regulated, accessible financial products. Combining the accessibility of ETFs with the yield-generating power of Ethereum’s PoS mechanism, these funds would allow investors to earn staking rewards without managing validators. The approval of such ETFs could boost Ethereum’s price, attract institutional capital and legitimize staking within regulated markets. However, regulatory hurdles and liquidity challenges would need to be overcome in order for these products to reach their full potential.

#LearnWithBybit