What is blockchain scalability? (Complete guide for beginners)

Blockchain technology provides an alternative to traditional centralized ledger systems by enabling secure and transparent transactions without relying on a single controlling authority. Its security is based on strong encryption methods and a decentralized network structure, which prevents data tampering and censorship. Despite these advantages, blockchains face significant challenges with regard to scalability and performance that restrict their ability to handle large transaction volumes efficiently. Limited transaction throughput and slower processing speeds — as compared to conventional Web 2.0 systems — hinder wider adoption of the technology in high-demand applications. 

The good news is that there's active work in the web3 industry aimed at addressing these limitations. While the best blockchains are still far less scalable than the fastest Web 2.0 systems, a number of solutions have been introduced over the past few years to close the gap. 

In this article, we discuss the concept of blockchain scalability, explain its underlying issues and outline the primary techniques to improve it while maintaining network integrity.

Key Takeaways:

• Blockchain scalability refers to a network’s ability to handle a growing number of transactions without compromising speed, cost, security or decentralization.

• Key approaches to improving scalability include Layer 1 consensus upgrades, parallelized processing through sharding, Layer 2 solutions such as sidechains and rollups, ecosystems of interoperable chains and modular blockchain architectures.

• Solutions include Layer 1 improvements — such as proof of stake (PoS), sharding and SegWit to enhance base chain performance — and Layer 2 solutions, such as sidechains and rollups (optimistic and zero-knowledge) to offload transactions.

What is blockchain scalability?

Blockchain is a type of decentralized digital ledger that records transactions securely and transparently without relying on a central authority. When Bitcoin (BTC) was launched in 2009, it marked the arrival of the first viable decentralized network secured by cryptography, enabling peer-to-peer digital currency transfers. While Bitcoin's decentralized model was a revolutionary concept, it quickly became clear that the blockchain was capable of handling only about seven transactions per second (TPS), and was thus limited in scalability as compared to traditional enterprise-grade Web 2.0 systems.

In this context, blockchain scalability refers to a network’s ability to increase transaction throughput while maintaining speed and security. TPS is a key metric used to measure this capacity, showing how many transactions can be handled each second at the network-wide level. Higher TPS allows a blockchain to support more users and applications without bottlenecks or excessive costs.

The challenge of achieving scalability on blockchain is tied to what is known as the blockchain trilemma. This concept highlights the difficulty of simultaneously optimizing the three core properties of blockchains: decentralization, security and scalability. Improving one or two often requires trade-offs that reduce the third. For example, increasing TPS by centralizing control can compromise decentralization and security.

Recent blockchain development

Following Bitcoin, newer blockchains such as Ethereum (ETH, introduced in 2015) have sought to improve performance by supporting more complex applications and smart contracts, but their scalability remains limited as compared to leading Web 2.0 systems.

More recent blockchain networks have made notable progress in performance. Solana (SOL), launched in 2020 and often cited as the most scalable among popular public blockchains, claims to support up to 65,000 TPS under ideal conditions. While this is a significant improvement — particularly over Bitcoin’s anemic 7 TPS — Solana and similar platforms still lag far behind powerful Web 2.0 computing infrastructures. For comparison, major cloud service providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud can process millions of transactions or requests per second by distributing workloads across vast data centers.

While blockchains do offer unique benefits through decentralization and security, their scalability remains a major bottleneck when compared to traditional systems.

Why is scalability important in blockchains?

Blockchain scalability is important because slow transaction speeds and limited capacity create bottlenecks that hinder wider adoption of the technology. When a blockchain processes transactions too slowly, user experience suffers, making it difficult for applications to gain traction. This problem is particularly evident in sectors like decentralized finance (DeFi) and gaming, in which speed and responsiveness are critical.

DeFi platforms depend upon quick transaction confirmations to execute trades, loans and other financial operations. Slow processing can lead to delays between a user’s request and the actual execution and expose users to risks, such as price slippage or failed transactions. These issues can cause frustration, loss of funds and missed opportunities, all of which discourage users from relying on blockchain-based financial services.

Similarly, blockchain-based gaming demands fast, seamless interactions to keep players engaged. Games that experience lag or delayed responses tend to lose users quickly because the experience falls short of the real-time expectations set by traditional gaming platforms. Without scalability improvements, blockchain games will always struggle to compete with their Web 2.0 counterparts.

Beyond these consumer-facing applications, insufficient scalability also limits blockchain adoption in the enterprise world. Many businesses require systems capable of handling vast numbers of transactions instantly while maintaining security and transparency. Blockchains’ limited throughput and higher latency often frustrate enterprise users. As a result, many companies hesitate to implement blockchain solutions at scale because current blockchain networks can’t match the speed and capacity of existing centralized infrastructure.

In short, improving blockchain scalability is essential for unlocking the technology’s full potential across finance, gaming, social, enterprise and numerous other fields. It’s evident that without significant improvements in scalability, blockchain will continue to face barriers to mainstream acceptance, remaining a niche technology favored by a limited segment of the market — its ardent aficionados.

Blockchain scalability issues

Scalability issues in blockchain systems show up in several concrete and recurring ways: limited transaction throughput, long confirmation times and high fees during periods of congestion. These problems affect both users and developers, creating friction that discourages the wider use of blockchain technology in everyday applications.

Network transaction speed and capacity

Most first-generation blockchains, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, use a structure whereby all nodes on the network must process and validate every transaction. This architecture preserves decentralization and security, but it limits the number of transactions that can be confirmed over a certain time interval. When demand exceeds network capacity, transactions begin to queue up, and users are forced to wait or compete to have their transactions processed first.

High transaction fees

This competition leads directly to the second issue: high transaction fees. Blockchains typically use a fee mechanism that gives priority to users who are willing to pay more. During high-traffic periods, fees can spike dramatically, making simple operations expensive and often unviable for smaller users. This dynamic has made some blockchain applications cost-prohibitive, particularly within DeFi platforms that often require multiple transactions to complete a single operation.

Probably the most glaring manifestation of this problem these days is that of Ethereum's high transaction fees, which can spike into double-digit USD rates at times of high network demand. While the typical transaction fee on Ethereum as of mid-2025 has declined to less than a dollar, some complex transactions in the DeFi and NFT domains can cost more than $95 during periods of network congestion.

Long confirmation times

The third major issue is that of long confirmation times, which occur when the network becomes congested and transactions are delayed in the queue. Unlike centralized systems, in which transaction processing can be nearly instant, blockchains rely on block production cycles and validator availability. On chains with slower block times or limited capacity, confirmation delays become more frequent, and can sometimes stretch into minutes or even hours. These delays create uncertainty, disrupt user experience and increase the likelihood of failed or outdated transactions.

Together, these three scalability issues form a self-reinforcing loop: congestion causes fees to rise and slows down confirmations, which in turn discourages usage and erodes trust in blockchain applications. For developers, these constraints limit what types of decentralized applications (DApps) can be built and scaled. For users, they create a slow, expensive and unpredictable environment. If not addressed, these limitations will continue to prevent blockchains from competing with Web 2.0’s fast and powerful infrastructure.

Blockchain scalability solutions

Various blockchain scalability solutions have been proposed and implemented to deliver faster and cheaper transactions, quick finality and high throughput. These solutions typically focus either on architectural modifications to the base Layer 1 chain or, alternatively, on keeping Layer 1 intact and extending the network's functionality via Layer 2 technologies.

Layer 1 solutions

Layer 1 solutions are protocol-level changes that directly modify the blockchain’s architecture to improve throughput and boost performance. These changes affect the way transactions are processed, validated and stored across a network.

Consensus mechanism improvements

Consensus mechanisms determine how nodes in a blockchain agree on the validity of transactions and the state of the ledger. The world’s oldest viable chain, the Bitcoin blockchain, uses the proof of work (PoW) consensus mechanism, which provides robust security but suffers from low throughput and high energy consumption. As the original consensus model implemented in the industry, PoW remains popular and, besides Bitcoin, is used by networks like Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Dogecoin (DOGE), Litecoin (LTC) and many more. 

A key way to achieve better scalability on Layer 1 has been the shift from PoW to newer, more scalable consensus algorithms. Perhaps the most common among these is proof of stake (PoS), now used by Ethereum (ETH) and many other smart contract–capable networks. 

PoS reduces the computational burden by allowing validators to process and attest transaction blocks based on the validators’ stakes, i.e., token holdings locked on the network. In contrast, PoW requires block validators (typically called miners on PoW-based chains) to solve complex, energy-consuming mathematical puzzles to add new blocks to the network's ledger. This transition from PoW to PoS has increased the newer blockchains’ efficiency and lowered energy usage, while also improving overall scalability.

Other performance-focused consensus mechanisms, such as delegated proof of stake (DPoS), used in networks like TRON (TRX), and proof of history (PoH), used by Solana (SOL), further optimize block production and scalability. These alternatives prioritize higher transaction capacity, making them attractive for applications that require real-time or near–real time performance.

Sharding

Sharding is a method of partitioning the blockchain network into smaller, manageable pieces called shards. Each shard processes its own set of transactions and maintains a subset of the total data, reducing the load on any single node and increasing overall network throughput.

Instead of requiring all nodes to validate every transaction, sharding allows parallel processing across multiple components. This significantly increases the number of transactions that can be handled simultaneously. Ethereum’s long-term scalability road map includes full sharding implementation, which is expected to multiply its transaction capacity while preserving decentralization and security.

While sharding is a promising solution, it introduces challenges such as cross-shard communication and data consistency. Nevertheless, it remains one of the most effective Layer 1 solutions for scaling blockchains while keeping validation securely distributed.

Segregated Witness (SegWit)

Segregated Witness, or SegWit, was introduced to address block size limitations in Bitcoin by separating a key piece of metadata, the signature data, from the core transaction data. By moving signatures out of the main transaction block, more space becomes available for additional transactions, effectively increasing throughput.

SegWit reduces transaction size and helps prevent certain types of transaction interferences. This upgrade allows more transactions per block, and improves the efficiency of block propagation across the network.

Originally proposed for the Bitcoin network, SegWit was first activated on Litecoin in May 2017, followed by Bitcoin a few months later. SegWit isn't a major game changer for blockchain scalability, although it has improved performance on the relatively slow chains on which it’s been activated.

Layer 2 solutions

Layer 2 solutions operate on top of existing blockchains, handling most transactions off the main Layer 1 networks while periodically settling final results on them. While this approach preserves an underlying network’s security and decentralization, it also greatly improves transaction speed and reduces congestion. The most common second-layer scalability solutions include sidechains and rollups (see below).

Sidechains

A sidechain is an independent blockchain that runs parallel to a main Layer 1 chain, and is connected to it via two-way bridges or anchors. Assets can move between the main blockchain network and the sidechain, allowing transactions and smart contracts to be executed on the latter.

Sidechains enable experimentation with different consensus models, block sizes or application-specific logic without affecting the stability of the main chain. They can process transactions more quickly and at a lower cost, then commit final results to the primary blockchain.

One limitation of sidechains is that they don’t inherit the full security guarantees of the main chain. Security depends upon the sidechain’s own validator set or consensus model, which thus introduces a separate trust layer.

Rollups

Rollups bundle — or "roll up" — multiple transactions into a single batch that is then posted to the main blockchain. Computation and storage are handled off-chain, while only summary data and proofs are recorded on-chain. This dramatically reduces the load on the base layer while preserving the security of the main network.

There are two main types of rollups in use: optimistic rollups and zero-knowledge (ZK) rollups. Optimistic rollups assume transactions posted to the underlying blockchain are valid by default, and rely on fraud-proofs raised by Layer 1 validators to catch any invalid activity. ZK rollups use cryptographic proofs that validate all transactions in the batch, offering faster transaction settlement than optimistic rollups, but with greater technical complexity.

Rollups have already been deployed on Ethereum to considerable effect, enabling faster and cheaper transactions for users while relieving congestion on the underlying network. They represent one of the most promising directions for scaling without sacrificing decentralization and security.

Emerging scalability approaches

Interoperability protocols

Interoperability protocols offer another pathway to scalability by enabling multiple blockchains to communicate and share data efficiently. Instead of scaling a single chain, these systems create networks of specialized chains that can offload work from one another while maintaining coordination. For instance, the Polkadot (DOT) ecosystem uses a central relay chain to connect independent networks called parachains, allowing them to process transactions in parallel while benefiting from shared security. 

Cosmos (ATOM) follows a somewhat similar model through its Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol, linking separate blockchains within the ecosystem, although there’s no centralized main chain as with Polkadot. These networks expand total transaction capacity across the ecosystem rather than within a single chain, providing a flexible approach to scalability. Interoperability protocols also lay the groundwork for application-specific chains optimized for specialized use cases.

Modular blockchains

Modular blockchains address scalability by breaking up the monolithic structure of traditional blockchains into separate, specialized layers. Instead of a single chain handling execution, consensus and data availability, modular architectures assign these tasks to distinct components. For example, Celestia (TIA) focuses primarily on data availability, allowing other networks to handle execution and settlement independently. This separation enables better scaling by letting each layer optimize for its specific function.

Closing thoughts

Scalability remains one of the most persistent challenges in blockchain development. While early networks like Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum laid the foundation for decentralized systems, their limited capacity has prompted ongoing efforts to improve throughput, reduce fees and enable mass adoption. Solutions have emerged at both the protocol and infrastructure levels, from Layer 1 upgrades and Layer 2 scaling frameworks to modular designs and interoperability networks.

Each approach offers trade-offs, but together they drive the industry toward more efficient and scalable architectures. As the blockchain community continues to test, refine and apply these methods, the gap between decentralized and traditional Web 2.0 systems will narrow further. One day, hopefully, blockchain will become the go-to infrastructure choice for applications with high scalability demands, from enterprise solutions and finance to games, social networks and beyond.

#LearnWithBybit